Student Pathfinder matches O-Level and A-Level results to the programmes and scholarships a student qualifies for today, plus the ones they're close to, with what would close the gap.
Pathfinder / Matched Opportunities
Illustrative example
BSc (Hons) Computer Science
Meets all requirements
Bachelor of Engineering (Civil)
Needs Physics grade B, currently C
STEM Futures Scholarship
Deadline in 6 weeks
National Merit Award
Needs 1 more A-Level pass at A
1 in 4
Of the 302,066 candidates who sat Zimbabwe's November 2025 O-Level exams, only 73,978 achieved the five-subject, Grade C or better benchmark most further-study and scholarship opportunities require. Even for them, there's currently no single place to see what they now qualify for.
Source: ZIMSEC — citation pending verification. Figure shown for illustration.
4.7%
Rural computer ownership sits under 5%, against 94.5% mobile phone ownership. A system that assumes every student can apply from their own device excludes most rural students by design. That is why the school, not the student, is the access point.
Source: ZIMSTAT / POTRAZ — citation pending verification. Figure shown for illustration.
How it works
Step 1
Results in
A teacher submits a student's O-Level or A-Level grades, term by term.
Step 2
Matching engine
Eligibility rules and ranking logic check those results against programmes and scholarships.
Step 3
Matched opportunities
A ranked list comes back: what the student qualifies for now, and what would close the gap.
For schools
A teacher or school administrator submits results each term. Matches flow back to the teacher, who relays them to the students who qualify, with no personal device or data bundle required for the student to benefit.
Student
Academic performance, held in school records
Teacher
Submits results, receives matches
Pathfinder
Matches performance to opportunities
Matches
Ranked, personalised per student